In another stunning decision, the United States Supreme Court prevented the Trump administration from ending Former President Obama’s executive order, DACA, sending shock waved throughout the land. The justices rejected administration arguments that the 8-year-old Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals Program is illegal and that courts have no role to play in reviewing the decision to end DACA. Chief Justice Roberts again departed from the Conservative Justices, using some progressive reasoning to deny President Trump’s effort to restore law & order. Last year he also joined the liberals on the court forcing the citizenship question to be removed from the 2020 census.
“The Supreme Court on Thursday rejected President Donald Trump’s effort to end legal protections for 650,000 young immigrants, a stunning rebuke to the president in the midst of his reelection campaign.”
“Chief Justice John Roberts, joined by his four liberal colleagues, wrote for the court that the administration did not pursue the end of the program properly.”
“We do not decide whether DACA or its rescission are sound policies,“ Roberts wrote. “We address only whether the agency complied with the procedural requirement that it provide a reasoned explanation for its action. Here the agency failed to consider the conspicuous issues of whether to retain forbearance and what if anything to do about the hardship to DACA recipients.”
“The court’s four conservative justices dissented. Justice Clarence Thomas, in a dissent joined by Justices Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch, wrote that DACA was illegal from the moment it was created under the Obama administration in 2012.”
Conservative Justice Clarence Thomas wrote the dissent, saying: “These cases could—and should—have ended with a determination that his legal conclusion was correct. Instead, the majority today concludes that DHS was required to do far more.”
He continued: “Without grounding its position in either the APA or precedent, the majority declares that DHS was required to overlook DACA’s obvious legal deficiencies and provide additional policy reasons and justifications before restoring the rule of law. This holding is incorrect, and it will hamstring all future agency attempts to undo actions that exceed statutory authority. I would, therefore, reverse the judgments below and remand with instructions to dissolve the nationwide injunctions.”
In this time of internal racial turmoil, excessive immigration, skyrocketing national debt, and the upcoming tsunami of AI/Robotics, We The People have been dealt with some major setbacks at the SCOTUS. Progressives, including Barak Obama who abusively used “prosecutorial privilege” to, in effect write immigration law, have passed unthinkable laws that have redefined cultural norms.
Roberts, for the majority, also wrote that The Department of Homeland Security can try again. The question is will they at this point?
After slow-walking this issue since 2018, the court has pushed this issue squarely into the 2020 election cycle. Will President Trump take a stand that DACA will be canceled, and deportations will take place, or will he still coddle the now adults, still in our country illegally, leaving the door open for a pathway to citizenship? Time will tell as time is running out on preserving our nation.
VIDEO OF THE DAYFacebook Finally Loses
Conservative independent talk show host and owner of https://MAGABOOK.com. USMC Veteran fighting daily to preserve Faith – Family – Country values in the United States of America.
Support my show and work by saving money on The Cost Club – http://www.MAGAMall.XYZ