As reported here, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) announced an Arizona ruling regarding Ballot Harvesting that will upset the left. The ruling affirmed a finding by Arizona courts that limited who could return ballots, which puts a damper on well-established ballot harvesting tactics used by the left to cheat in elections.
Key Point: SCOTUS ruled that Arizona election laws concerning who can return completed ballots do not violate the Voting Rights Act. This is a huge win for election integrity. The decision was 6-3.
Supreme Court upholds Arizona restrictions in major voting rights, a racial discrimination case. The case tested whether Arizona restrictions violate the 1965 Republican-supported Civil Rights Act.
Democrats and far-left activists rely upon racial division in America to push for a Marxist and anti-American agenda in public policy, and they are constantly trying to cause societal disharmony citing the Republican-led Civil Rights movement and the Republican designed and passed Civil Rights Act. as if the Democrats had anything at all to do with the Act.
That doesn’t stop them from trying to invoke it whenever they are losing. Including when they can not win elections and need to cause chaos and so they can cheat. Ballot Harvesting is a well-known tactic for cheating in elections used by Democrats.
SCOTUS Blog reported on the matter:
“Supreme Court issues ruling in Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee, major voting-rights case out of Arizona. In the 6-3 ruling, SCOTUS upholds two Arizona voting provisions: a ban on so-called “ballot harvesting” and a policy that throws out an entire ballot if cast in the wrong precinct. Challengers argued that both provisions discriminate against minority voters.”
BREAKING NEWS: In 6-3 ruling, SCOTUS upholds two Arizona voting provisions: a ban on so-called "ballot harvesting," and a policy that throws out an entire ballot if it was cast in the wrong precinct. Challengers argued that both provisions discriminate against minority voters.
— SCOTUSblog (@SCOTUSblog) July 1, 2021
Black Lives Matter member Katie Hobbs, the Democrat Secretary of State, was anger and hurt over the ruling.
Our country was built on the promise that our democracy would be reflective of our communities. Every eligible American should be able to cast a vote, and have it counted. My response to the Supreme Court’s ruling in Brnovich v DNC. ⬇️ pic.twitter.com/vsC1KVO1mN
— Secretary Katie Hobbs (@SecretaryHobbs) July 1, 2021
— ABC News (@ABC) July 1, 2021
Left-leaning ABC News reported:
“A divided US Supreme Court on Thursday upheld two Republican-backed Arizona voting restrictions, rejecting claims that they discriminate against minority voters and imposing new limits on the landmark Voting Rights Act.
The 6-to-3 decision, breaking along ideological lines, overturned a lower court ruling to uphold Arizona’s policy of invalidating ballots cast in the wrong precinct and a law criminalizing the collection of mail ballots by third-party community groups or campaigns.
Writing for the court’s six conservatives, Justice Samuel Alito said Section 2 requires equal openness to voting, not equal outcomes.
“It appears that the core of [Section 2] is the requirement that voting be ‘equally open.’ The statute’s reference to equal ‘opportunity’ may stretch that concept to some degree to include consideration of a person’s ability to use the means that are equally open. But equal openness remains the touchstone,” Alito wrote.
Bottom Line: If this ruling had been in place for 2020, President Donald J. Trump would still be president, and everyone knows it, including the left.
Going Down A Rabbit Hole:
Read the full ruling: 19-1257_g204
VIDEO OF THE DAYIdiots Twerk On Ambulance After Shooting In Oakland, CA
Kari is an ex-Community Organizer who writes about Voter Engagement, Cultural Marxism and Campaigns. She has been a grassroots volunteer with the GOP, on and off for 18 years. She is a Homeschool Mom in North Carolina and loves Photojournalism and Citizen Journalism. @Saorsa1776