A group of experts led by a famous scientist, John Droz, Jr, compiled original election data and reports and linked to other accurate sources of information in one comprehensive website to warehouse statistical information on the 2020 Presidential election for public use. The information is complex, so I called him and spoke with him about how an average concerned citizen could dive into the group’s work.
“The narratives we are being told, that people were angry with Trump, so they didn’t vote, and that there wasn’t enough fraud to change the outcome of the election are wrong, and President Trump lost all of is lawsuits is all wrong, so that is one thing I want people to understand from our work,” he told me. “We want to address those incorrect narratives.”
Droz, according to Scientific American is so powerful a man they describe him as, “The Man Who Makes Sea Level Rise Go Away, so he has some credibility here with his statistical analysis on the country’s most strange election.
“Our team of authors of 2020 election-related analyses is unpaid volunteers, whose expertise covers a wide range of fields (Cyber Security, IT, Statistics, Physics, Economics, etc.). Our main interest is in assuring election integrity, which is when American citizens legally express their preferences for their representatives. In the last few months, we have generated multiple 2020 election-related reports.”
“It was a huge amount of work to compile all of this data; we did some of these reports because we were asked to and some reports we wanted to do. I can not talk about what the reports mean, but I am suggesting that there are obvious areas to see here that would indicate something more needs to be investigated,” he said.
THE NARRATIVES ARE WRONG:
We are told people were just mad at Trump and not voting. But he got more votes in 2020 than he got in 2016.
For example, Droz pointed out to me a report titled 2020 Presidential Election Contrast Report:
Droz describes that report as: “A statistical analysis of Presidential vote differences between 2020 and 2016 — first by state, and then by county with each state. The authors are independent statistical and analytical experts, who are unpaid volunteers, interested in the election integrity issue.”
“This is the only report that we know of that addresses every county in the country, and looking at the data shows an interesting story,” he told me.
Look, Wake Co. North Carolina, (see page 43) showed an increase in votes for President Trump. “When we are told that so many people were unhappy with him, so why did he get more votes in 2020 than he got in 2016?”
According to the chart, Trump got 30,000 more votes in Wake Co. North Carolina in 2020 than he got in 2016.
We are told that the amount of fraud would not change the outcome of the election. But In Nevada, they found 130,000 illegal votes in an area where Biden won by less than 35,000 votes.
Binnall testified, “All in all, our experts identified over 130,000 unique instances of voter fraud in Nevada. But the actual number is almost certainly higher. Our data scientists made these calculations not by estimations or statistical sampling, but by analyzing and comparing the list of actual voters with other lists, most of which are publicly available. To put it simply, they explained their methods so that others could check their work. Our evidence has never been refuted, only ignored.”
According to the AP, 33,596 separated Trump and Biden in Nevada.
We are told that Trump lost all of the election cases. When in fact he won most cases.
“Trump and/or the GOP plaintiff prevailed in 15 out of 22 cases decided on the merits,” Droz said.
Gateway Pundit reported on the same list of lawsuits, highlighting the following:
- There are 83 court cases to date based on the 2020 election
- In 26 cases President Trump was the plaintiff
- In 53 cases President Trump is not the plaintiff
- In 4 cases President Trump is the defendant
- 21 cases have been decided on their merits
- President Trump/GOP won 14 of the 21 cases decided on the merits
- Most of the cases were never looked at by the court
- 18 cases remain active
Here is a link to the list of cases. Notice this file is updated on an ad hoc basis so numbers may change.
Along with the mainstream media, Big Tech, the Justice Department, and the FBI, the courts proved these past few months that they cannot be trusted to stand up for America and its Constitution,” Gateway Pundit reported.
“I am not going to say why that happened; my point is that the narrative we are being told is wrong,” Droz told me.
VIDEO OF THE DAYIdiots Twerk On Ambulance After Shooting In Oakland, CA
Keep this article and share it because the amount of technical data here shows that above all else, there is plenty of reason to investigate what happened in 2020 a lot deeper than we have been allowed to do up until now.
Kari is an ex-Community Organizer who writes about Voter Engagement, Cultural Marxism and Campaigns. She has been a grassroots volunteer with the GOP, on and off for 18 years. She is a Homeschool Mom in North Carolina and loves Photojournalism and Citizen Journalism. @Saorsa1776