SHE IS ALIVE! ‘Baby Roe’ Could Reverse Jane Roe’s Legacy In Interview, But Is The Left Ready To Hear About It?

The woman known as “Jane Roe,” who went to the US Supreme Court to get the right to kill her baby, is the inspiration of most of the politics on the left.  And after 50 years of taking people back to the Stone Age and convincing American women that they could not figure out how to prevent getting pregnant, the left is facing a devastating blow to their identity, with the US Supreme Court potentially ruling on abortion again- perhaps unfavorably to the left.

Key Point: If abortion decisions leave the Fed’s ‘power mitten’ and get bumped down to the states, the Democrats lose abortion as an organizing tool for federal elections,and the entire political landscape will change. If abortion is not being pushed for political power, interest in killing babies may decrease.

As politicians, who are funded by abortion providers, push to normalize killing babies- as healthcare- we need to have a serious discussion about the damaging effects of an out-of-control industry on women’s mental health.

Consider Abortion lover, Lisa Murkowski.  The more women kill their babies, the more wealthy Murkowski becomes:

So good to see so many in Alaska and around the country joining the Women’s Marches in support of reproductive health. https://t.co/osTpcocGLN

— Sen. Lisa Murkowski (@lisamurkowski) October 3, 2021

IN THE NEWS AGAIN- STOKE THE FIRES

So Roe became a mythological feminist hero for killing her baby. However, the baby wasn’t killed, and the baby ended up being adopted and became a Mom herself. Finally, in 2021, as the country faces a demonic activist backlash from Democrats and leftists everywhere over the thoughts of losing abortion as a rallying cry, and after 50 years, Baby ‘Roe’ is ready to talk about her point of view.

Left-leaning, anti-Conservative, anti-American media groups like The Atlantic magazine and ABC promote baby “Roe” ahead of her first televised interview.

The Daily Mail reported on the upcoming show: 

“‘Roe baby’ Shelley Lynn Thornton, 51, is to give her first EVER television interview after being revealed as a child who sparked landmark abortion legislation

• Thornton’s mother, Norma McCorvey, known as Jane Roe, won the right to abortion with a Supreme Court ruling in 1973
• McCorvey had fallen pregnant and wanted an abortion in Texas but by the time she won her case, she had already given birth to a baby girl
• The little girl was given up for adoption and, aged 18, she would learn who her biological mother was – and her history
• McCorvey died in 2017 and Thornton, now a mother of three, wrestled with whether to meet her, eventually deciding not to
• Thornton broke her silence in a book, excerpts of which were published by The Atlantic last month
• On Monday Thornton will give her first televised interview, with ABC News 

Due to the political leanings of The Atlantic and ABC it is difficult to imagine that they would promote or televise anything that was not favorable to the left or to pro-abortion issues.  With the amount of cancel culture the left is capable of dealing to the media business, annoying them would be unwise. So it is questionable what they will tolerate from this interview.

MENTAL ILLNESS FRENZY

It is also difficult to comprehend that a woman, who much of the left wanted to see dead, and grew up to be a mother of three babies, could possibly come out publically in support of people who wanted to see her dead. Would that not be an insult to her children? It feels like that would be the height is self-deprecation.

In the Atlantic article about Thorton’s life that lead up to this interview, the final chapter gives us a hint at the direction the television programming may go.  When exploring whether Thorton would visit her birth mother, “Jane Roe” whose real name was Norma, on her dying day, Baby Roe reveals what is on her mind:

“Shelley had long held a private hope, she said, that Norma would one day “feel something for another human being, especially for one she brought into this world.” Now that Norma was dying, Shelley felt that desire acutely. “I want her to experience this joy—the good that it brings,” she told me. “I have wished that for her forever and have never told anyone.”

But Shelley let the hours pass on that winter’s day. And then it was too late.

From Shelley’s perspective, it was clear that if she, the Roe baby, could be said to represent anything, it was not the sanctity of life but the difficulty of being born unwanted.”

BEING BORN UNWANTED- WHY ARE WOMEN ACTING CRAZY? WHY ARE SOME WOMEN UNABLE TO LOVE?

Since the abortion fever of the 60’s, many people have grown up with the understanding that they were born not wanted because it was unfashionable for women to want their babies.  Once the law was passed that women could kill their babies, the abortion industry marketed the merits of baby-killing with the “Women’s liberation” movement, using powerful advertising techniques to train people that life was not sacred. Professional messaging, branding and PR was pushed everywhere that Babies were lumps of nothing that would be a burden if allowed to be born. How could anyone party and date if they had a baby to tend to?

Remember that we are talking about the generations that practiced “free love” and were highly sexualized in general, with the introduction of all sorts of hedonism and rampant substance abuse.

Yet discussions about how to prevent pregnancy were, at the same time treated like they were witchcraft and banished from society. Have free love everywhere- but don’t dare talk about the possibility that intercourse is how pregnancy happens.

That is mental illness.

So how did women not understand how to prevent pregnancy?  Or was baby murder some sort of rite of passage? Or just a moneymaker for people who wanted to sell services to kill babies?

Since the 1960’s Planned Parenthood, the leading provider of killing unwanted babies has become a politically powerful and very wealthy corporation.  Recent reports are that they have now branched out into trafficking human organs.

That is a mental illness in and of itself.

With the absence of serious grown-ups addressing mental illness, the unwanted children of the 1960’s parents, who survived abortion, have had to come to terms with so much pain from an out-of-control generation who allowed the killing of babies to become an industry.

Many of us were raised by people who appear to have never taken responsibilities for life seriously. Not for theirs and not for the children they brought into the world.

This is the time to change all of that. Women can do a lot to prevent unwanted pregnancy. Let’s talk about that.

Let’s stop being so crazy.

Learning to prevent unwanted pregnancy, before a woman gets pregnant could be the legacy of ‘Baby Roe’, she could change her mother’s entire abortion legacy.

Baby Roe represents a lot of us whose parents are mentally ill, addicted to drugs, and uninterested in the fact that we were born.

This interview has the potential to reach people in new ways and help women learn how much damage abortion has done to our culture and to humanity. There is a big difference between growing up unwanted and growing up wanted.

But will this generation be brave enough to go there?  We will find out soon.

Further reading on abortion and organ trafficing:

Planned Parenthood Pushing For ‘Deviant’ Sex Ed Bill In Illinois, “To Keep Them From Finding Out Online”

Kari Donovan

Kari is an ex-Community Organizer who writes about Voter Engagement, Cultural Marxism and Campaigns. She has been a grassroots volunteer with the GOP, on and off for 18 years. She is a Homeschool Mom in North Carolina and loves Photojournalism and Citizen Journalism. @Saorsa1776