• About
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • Contact
Sunday, April 11, 2021
  • Login
No Result
View All Result
NEWSLETTER
DJHJ Media
  • Home
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
    • Science
    • Tech
  • Get My Book!
  • Shop
  • Home
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
    • Science
    • Tech
  • Get My Book!
  • Shop
No Result
View All Result
DJHJ Media
No Result
View All Result
Home Censorship

Trump Wants Immediate Action on National Security Danger; The Internet

by Kari Donovan
November 27, 2020
in Censorship
0 0
0
Trump Wants Immediate Action on National Security Danger; The Internet
0
SHARES
9.8k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

President Donald J. Trump tweeted on Thursday that immediate action is needed to terminate a statute “specifically excepts federal criminal liability” known as “Section 230”, which generally provides immunity for website publishers from third-party content.

It is unclear yet if Trump’s tweet has anything to do with the election, or if his concerns is limited to censorship online.

Trump tweeted:

For purposes of National Security, Section 230 must be immediately terminated!!!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 27, 2020

His earlier tweets were:

Twitter is sending out totally false “Trends” that have absolutely nothing to do with what is really trending in the world. They make it up, and only negative “stuff”. Same thing will happen to Twitter as is happening to @FoxNews daytime. Also, big Conservative discrimination!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 27, 2020

I gave a long news conference today after wishing the military a Happy Thanksgiving, & realized once again that the Fake News Media coordinates so that the real message of such a conference never gets out. Primary point made was that the 2020 Election was RIGGED, and that I WON!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 27, 2020

A look at SECTION 230 according to Cornell University:

47 U.S. Code § 230 – Protection for private blocking and screening of offensive material

  • U.S. Code
  • Notes

(a)FindingsThe Congress finds the following:(1)The rapidly developing array of Internet and other interactive computer services available to individual Americans represent an extraordinary advance in the availability of educational and informational resources to our citizens.(2)These services offer users a great degree of control over the information that they receive, as well as the potential for even greater control in the future as technology develops.(3)The Internet and other interactive computer services offer a forum for a true diversity of political discourse, unique opportunities for cultural development, and myriad avenues for intellectual activity.(4)The Internet and other interactive computer services have flourished, to the benefit of all Americans, with a minimum of government regulation.(5)Increasingly Americans are relying on interactive media for a variety of political, educational, cultural, and entertainment services.(b)PolicyIt is the policy of the United States—(1)to promote the continued development of the Internet and other interactive computer services and other interactive media;(2)to preserve the vibrant and competitive free market that presently exists for the Internet and other interactive computer services, unfettered by Federal or State regulation;(3)to encourage the development of technologies which maximize user control over what information is received by individuals, families, and schools who use the Internet and other interactive computer services;(4)to remove disincentives for the development and utilization of blocking and filtering technologies that empower parents to restrict their children’s access to objectionable or inappropriate online material; and(5)to ensure vigorous enforcement of Federal criminal laws to deter and punish trafficking in obscenity, stalking, and harassment by means of computer.(c)Protection for “Good Samaritan” blocking and screening of offensive material(1)Treatment of publisher or speaker

No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.(2)Civil liabilityNo provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be held liable on account of—(A)any action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict access to or availability of material that the provider or user considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected; or(B)any action taken to enable or make available to information content providers or others the technical means to restrict access to material described in paragraph (1).[1](d)Obligations of interactive computer service

A provider of interactive computer service shall, at the time of entering an agreement with a customer for the provision of interactive computer service and in a manner deemed appropriate by the provider, notify such customer that parental control protections (such as computer hardware, software, or filtering services) are commercially available that may assist the customer in limiting access to material that is harmful to minors. Such notice shall identify, or provide the customer with access to information identifying, current providers of such protections.(e)Effect on other laws(1)No effect on criminal law

Nothing in this section shall be construed to impair the enforcement of section 223 or 231 of this title, chapter 71 (relating to obscenity) or 110 (relating to sexual exploitation of children) of title 18, or any other Federal criminal statute.(2)No effect on intellectual property law

Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit or expand any law pertaining to intellectual property.(3)State law

Nothing in this section shall be construed to prevent any State from enforcing any State law that is consistent with this section. No cause of action may be brought and no liability may be imposed under any State or local law that is inconsistent with this section.(4)No effect on communications privacy law

Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the application of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986 or any of the amendments made by such Act, or any similar State law.(5)No effect on sex trafficking lawNothing in this section (other than subsection (c)(2)(A)) shall be construed to impair or limit—(A)any claim in a civil action brought under section 1595 of title 18, if the conduct underlying the claim constitutes a violation of section 1591 of that title;(B)any charge in a criminal prosecution brought under State law if the conduct underlying the charge would constitute a violation of section 1591 of title 18; or(C)any charge in a criminal prosecution brought under State law if the conduct underlying the charge would constitute a violation of section 2421A of title 18, and promotion or facilitation of prostitution is illegal in the jurisdiction where the defendant’s promotion or facilitation of prostitution was targeted.(f)DefinitionsAs used in this section:(1)Internet

The term “Internet” means the international computer network of both Federal and non-Federal interoperable packet switched data networks.(2)Interactive computer service

The term “interactive computer service” means any information service, system, or access software provider that provides or enables computer access by multiple users to a computer server, including specifically a service or system that provides access to the Internet and such systems operated or services offered by libraries or educational institutions.(3)Information content provider

The term “information content provider” means any person or entity that is responsible, in whole or in part, for the creation or development of information provided through the Internet or any other interactive computer service.(4)Access software providerThe term “access software provider” means a provider of software (including client or server software), or enabling tools that do any one or more of the following:(A)filter, screen, allow, or disallow content;(B)pick, choose, analyze, or digest content; or(C)transmit, receive, display, forward, cache, search, subset, organize, reorganize, or translate content.(June 19, 1934, ch. 652, title II, § 230, as added Pub. L. 104–104, title V, § 509, Feb. 8, 1996, 110 Stat. 137; amended Pub. L. 105–277, div. C, title XIV, § 1404(a), Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–739; Pub. L. 115–164, § 4(a), Apr. 11, 2018, 132 Stat. 1254.)

Some posters believe that Section 230 is interfering with communication about alleged election interference:

A tale of two tweets. @realDonaldTrump knew of and tweeted of voter fraud as a private citizen 8 years ago not censored but is as President. You think he was not prepared for this?

Revoke section 230 Twitter and Facebook are participating in election interference. pic.twitter.com/j3ixWCmtk2

— Just Jeff 🇺🇸🇺🇸 (@bahamamills) November 18, 2020

Republican Josh Hawley posted that he supports repealing “section 230”:

Repealing #Section230 as part of the Defense bill (NDAA) Senate will vote on next month is one of the best ideas I’ve heard in a while

— Josh Hawley (@HawleyMO) November 20, 2020

Other issues on the table at that meeting will be propaganda:

Please revoke Obama’s propaganda bill 🙏🏻

The (2012) National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) legalized the use of propaganda on the US public.
On January 2, 2013 Barack Obama signed and enacted into “law” HR 4310, also known as Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2012#fakenews https://t.co/l0v8QneEFz

— freedom (@annikawu) November 22, 2020

A look on Wikipedia:

“Section 230 immunity is not unlimited. The statute specifically excepts federal criminal liability (§230(e)(1)), electronic privacy violations (§230(e)(4)) and intellectual property claims (§230(e)(2)).[5] There is also no immunity from state laws that are consistent with 230(e)(3) though state criminal laws have been held preempted in cases such as Backpage.com, LLC v. McKenna[6] and Voicenet Commc’ns, Inc. v. Corbett[7] (agreeing “[T]he plain language of the CDA provides … immunity from inconsistent state criminal laws.”).

As of mid-2016, courts have issued conflicting decisions regarding the scope of the intellectual property exclusion set forth in §230(e)(2). For example, in Perfect 10, Inc. v. CCBill, LLC,[8] the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the exception for intellectual property law applies only to federal intellectual property claims such as copyright infringement, trademark infringement, and patents, reversing a district court ruling that the exception applies to state-law right of publicity claims.[9] The 9th Circuit’s decision in Perfect 10 conflicts with conclusions from other courts including Doe v. Friendfinder. The Friendfinder court specifically discussed and rejected the lower court’s reading of “intellectual property law” in CCBill and held that the immunity does not reach state right of publicity claims.[10]

Additionally, with the passage of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act in 1998, service providers must comply with additional requirements for copyright infringement to maintain safe harbor protections from liability, as defined in the DMCA’s Title II, Online Copyright Infringement Liability Limitation Act.[11]“

However with all of these laws and regulations, Big Tech is censoring the President of the United States and with media outlets, public officials and attorneys who post about the 2020 elections vote fraud issues.

The election interference from main/lamestream media and big tech companies in USA 2020 election is unprecedented
Article section 230 must be revoked now
To cut down these growing long tails of Media, to Stop them from destroying our hard earned democracy!!!

— #stopthestealusaelection2020 (@Sammy20212) November 19, 2020

Republican Senator Ted Cruz had a Senate hearing with the heads of Facebook and Twitter recently to talk about their censorship of posters. Cruz brought up section 230.

.@jack: When you label tweets, you’re taking a policy position.

When you’re taking a policy position, you’re a publisher, even under current law.

You’re entitled to take a policy position, but you don’t get to pretend you’re not a publisher & get #Section230 benefits. pic.twitter.com/JsDUvqjatS

— Senator Ted Cruz (@SenTedCruz) November 18, 2020

We will follow the developments of this story.

Kari Donovan

Kari is an ex-Community Organizer who writes about Voter Engagement, Cultural Marxism and Campaigns. She has been a grassroots volunteer with the GOP, on and off for 18 years. She is a Homeschool Mom in North Carolina and loves Photojournalism and Citizen Journalism. @Saorsa1776

ShareTweetShare
Next Post
Big Brother Alert! GOP Vermont Governor Directs Schools To “Ask” Students About Their Family’s Thanksgiving Activities

Big Brother Alert! GOP Vermont Governor Directs Schools To "Ask" Students About Their Family’s Thanksgiving Activities

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Join our mailing list!

Top News

  • 2 Black Female DC Teens Will Not Face Consequences For Violent Death Of Asian Uber Eats Diver

    2 Black Female DC Teens Will Not Face Consequences For Violent Death Of Asian Uber Eats Diver

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Andy Ngo: American Journalist Who Exposes Antifa Flees The United States Due To Safety Concerns

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • ARREST: [VIDEO)] BLM-New Black Panthers, Activists Storm Iowa Capitol With Intent To Harm, In Planned Organized Uprising

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • The People Behind the MLB Moving the All-Star Game Out of Atlanta

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Biden Selects Former Japanese Internment Camp Site to House Unaccounpanied Illegal Alien Migrant Children

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

Recommended

Tom Brady Enjoys Victory Boat Parade with the Bucs and “Avocado Tequila” and Goes Viral

Tom Brady Enjoys Victory Boat Parade with the Bucs and “Avocado Tequila” and Goes Viral

2 months ago
Portland Police Detain 100 Antifa Rioters, Arrest 13

Portland Police Detain 100 Antifa Rioters, Arrest 13

4 weeks ago

Newsletter

Never miss an update. Sign up for our morning updates.
SUBSCRIBE

Category

  • 2020 Elections
  • 2022 Elections
  • ANTIFA
  • Back the Blue
  • Biden Lies
  • Black Lives Matter
  • Border Crisis
  • Business
  • Cancel Culture
  • Censorship
  • Climate Change
  • Communist Chinese Party
  • Corporate Fascism
  • COVID-19
  • Crime
  • Economy
  • Education
  • Entertainment
  • Environment
  • Fake News
  • Fashion
  • food
  • Gaming
  • Health
  • Immigration
  • Lifestyle
  • Marxism
  • Media
  • Military
  • Movie
  • Music
  • National
  • Opinion
  • Politics
  • Racism
  • Religion
  • Riots
  • Science
  • Second Amendment
  • Sexual Harassment
  • Social Media
  • Socialism
  • Sports
  • Taxes
  • Tech
  • Travel
  • Uncategorized
  • US Constitution
  • US News
  • Video
  • Viral
  • Voter Fraud
  • Voter ID
  • Western Civilization
  • Woke Supremacists
  • World

Site Links

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

About Us

DJHJ Media is an opinion and commentary source for conservatives everywhere.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • Contact

© 2020 DJHJ Media | Turbocharged by AdRevv.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Politics
  • Business
  • World
  • Get My Book!
  • Shop

© 2020 DJHJ Media | Turbocharged by AdRevv.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Create New Account!

Fill the forms bellow to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In