When guerilla warfare tactics of leftist Marxist Community Organizers intersect with the powerful mind control tactics of the Chinese Communist Party and are applied, unopposed, in a free and open society, then citizens are in danger of finding themselves in the middle of a violent revolution.
Enter George Floyd trial. Floyd is the latest unfortunate death by a police officer during an arrest to be exploited by a Marxist Defund the Police movement. Exploited is the correct term to use because a well-organized political movement has been on the lookout and ready to spring into action, over such a death, for a long time.
IMPORTANT TO REMEMBER THAT ‘DEFUNDING THE POLICE’ WAS A PLAN, NOT A REACTION
Found in this 2004 Policy Link Manual, written by Maya Harris, the sister of Kamala Harris, is found a wealth of Marxist tactics to use political theater, media, messaging, and branding to defund local police departments, by force to achieve certain goals that they can not bring about at the ballot box.
From page 8, the author describes the tactics she will teach activists and community organizers to take in order to bring about their desired collective changes to police departments:
“Fundamentally, police reform advocacy aims to redefine the relationship of police departments to
the communities they serve—a relationship defined over decades of interaction and laden with all the
complexities of race and class. This is no small feat. Advocates usually face a well-funded, politically
Progress takes persistence, and change takes time. Advocacy efforts typically focus
on changing specific policies and practices that are incremental steps toward the much larger goal.
For all the challenges that exist, advocates in cities across the nation have achieved great successes in
securing improved police policies and practices and in moving their police departments closer to a vision
of community-centered policing. Some advocates have been doing this work for years; others have only
recently begun. All have relied on one or more of the advocacy strategies discussed in this manual as a
vehicle for change. Examples of their accomplishments and many lessons learned are described in this
manual,” Harris writes.
According to the defunding the policy manual:
Organized for Change is divided into five main sections:
Seizing the Moment: Urgent, Unified Community Response recognizes that police reform
advocacy often arises in the context of crisis—a high-profile instance of police misconduct that
focuses public attention for a moment in time on the need for positive change within the police
department. The chapter provides tips for resolving the circumstances at hand, while leveraging
the situation to advance a broader advocacy agenda.
Getting Specific: Know Your Police Department starts from the premise that an effective
strategy for change requires a firm understanding of what you currently have in place so that
you can develop a roadmap from where you are starting to where you want to go. The chapter
provides a range of topics and policies to consider.
Getting People Together and Making Your Case groups together four advocacy strategies:
organizing and coalition building; conducting research; working with the media; and harnessing
the power of the Internet. Each of these strategies is about building support for your advocacy
agenda. More often than not, one—if not all—of these strategies is invoked in any police
reform advocacy effort, regardless of the forum in which change is pursued.
Getting What You Want and Changing the Rules describes the four traditional forums in
which advocates pursue their agendas for change: the courts, the legislature, the ballot, and
administrative agencies. Sometimes these strategies are used in isolation; other times in
combination or succession. This section concludes with a reminder to think outside the box
and includes examples of tools and tactics that go beyond the traditional steps discussed
in the preceding chapters.
Getting Started: Tips to Consider in Moving an Agenda provides several nuts-and-bolts
issues to consider as you launch your advocacy effort—and get organized for change.
The manual is very specific in teaching activists how to train others for a full political movement. Along with Grassroots marketing platforms, and taxpayer-funded non-government organizations (NGO), activism like this has been a lucrative business for decades.
BRING IN NEW ALLIES AND NEW TECHNOLOGY FOR A POWERFUL CHANGE AGENT IN AMERICA
Along with a well-established path of distribution for the messaging about Floyd, and a built-in powerhouse PR movement, the left is able to use Floyd as an icon of dissent and organization with new technology.
According to CCP expert, Gordon Chang, there is a good reason to understand the influence of TikTok on American culture.
— Gordon G. Chang (@GordonGChang) October 4, 2020
Enter Big Tech, Silicon Valley and Tik Toc
“Chairman Xi destroyed the lives of George Floyd and a further 1/4 million Americans with fentanyl. Intentionally. Then he used AI and social media to turn us against each other over it. And it worked. I testified before the senate to explain how he did it,” Paul Dabrowa posted.
Chairman Xi destroyed the lives of George Floyd and a further 1/4 million Americans with fentanyl. Intentionally. Then he used AI and social media to turn us against each other over it. And it worked. I testified before the senate to explain how he did it: https://t.co/HGNHHW5yxB pic.twitter.com/RfIlQVzVth
— Paul Dabrowa (@PaulDabrowa) April 8, 2021
In his paper, Cognitive Hacking as the New Disinformation Frontier, Dabrowa discussed how The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) uses “Artificial Intelligence Algorithms” which are designed to repress the Chinese population. The paper is based on his testimony that was presented before the Commonwealth of Australia Senate Select Committee on Foreign Interference through Social Media on September 22, 2020.
“The risk in the new propaganda war The science and practice of persuasion has gotten drastically more sophisticated in recent years, thanks in large part to technology. Today, digitally-crafted propaganda can trigger wars, economic collapse, riots, and protests of all kinds. It can also destroy the credibility of
government institutions and turn a population against itself,” Dabrowa wrote.
In his testimony, at the link, Dabrowa lays out the numerous ways that TikTok uses to control and propagandize the population, and ends in concludes:
In recent times, the Australian public has started to realise that the Chinese Communist Party is systematically working to undermine Australian national security. One method is via social media applications such as TikTok; which currently remains a platform for censorship and propaganda while gathering an extraordinary amount of data on Australian users. The CCP uses similar platforms domestically to control and persecute its population.
The regime understands the enormous influence social media exerts in manipulating politics and national
elections. It seeks to exercise some of this same influence, and same power, more directly here in Australia, in an effort to control what Australians see, hear, and ultimately think.
TikTok poses a clear national security risk to the Australian population and should be banned.
I urge the Australian Government to take all measured actions necessary to protect Australians and our national interest: insisting on an outright sale of TikTok or, if necessary, ban the application to protect Australian national security.”
One has to wonder, if these dangers to national security are unfolding for Australia, are they unfolding here as well. Could this be what President Donald J. Trump had been warning us about?
Kari is an ex-Community Organizer who writes about Cultural Marxism, grassroots activism, music, IndyCar racing and political campaigns. @Saorsa1776