By now, you have probably heard that a criminal leaked an initial draft document of a vote to end the Roe v Wade decision. It was a draft opinion and in my own opinion; it was the right decision. Roe v Wade was never Constitutionally sound because there is nothing in the US Constitution about abortion. You can read the Constitution, hold it up to the light, upside down, and pour lemon juice on it, and you still will not find any reference to abortion.
The other problem I have always had with Roe is found in Article I, Section 1 of the Constitution, which is the very first thing in the Constitution that defines our government:
“All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and a House of Representatives.”
Notice that it does not say legislative powers are granted to the Supreme Court. It says legislative powers are granted to the Congress, which consists of a Senate and a House of Representatives. This means, when liberals and members of the Politically Correct Death Squad want to claim that Roe v Wade is “settled law,” they are talking out their rumps because it was never a law. It was a court ruling and, as we just went over, courts do not have the power to create laws.
When the official ruling comes out the way the initial draft is written by Justice Samuel Alito, Row v Wade is will be remembered as nothing more than the greatest decision General Washington had to make before crossing the Delaware River to take the British camps in the middle of the night.
It was expected that the lunatic left was going to go completely berserk when they heard this. The lies came fast and furious. Some started saying the ruling would make abortion illegal in the US while other dopes said that women would go back to having back-alley abortions and something about coat hangers. Personally, I have more faith in American women in general to not break the law so egregiously. But even so, neither of these lies are true.
Other leftist were screaming about women’s right being violated and I responded to a few of them on Twitter by telling them that they cannot argue about women’s rights because they cannot even define what a woman is. I love it when liberalism eats itself.
The biggest part of this decision that liberals will never understand is that the ruling doesn’t really have to do with abortion, because once Roe v Wade is overturned, the country then goes back to federalism where individual states will make their own laws. That’s how it was done before the Court bastardized our system and made the abortion ruling back some 50 years ago. The Roe decision was very bad for the country. Liberals do not care about the damage these kinds of things do to our Constitutional republic. They don’t care about such very important things.
The problem many have with this is that the leak was very dangerous and unprecedented. Never before in the entire history of the Supreme Court was this done. Speculation is that the leak was done by a leftist who probably clerked for a leftist justice and thought they were going to cause mayhem and chaos that would scare the bideezles out of at least one of the conservative justices to change their mind. The leaker should be fired and charged with a crime, then disbarred for life. Don’t worry. The leaker will be just fine after every leftist woke news outlet makes them a hero, secures a multi-million dollar book deal, and gives them a high-paying job as a legal consultant.
It was reported that Chief Justice John Roberts wants an investigation to find out who the leaker was, which confirms that the document is accurate. The way I would handle it is I would tell every clerk that they have six hours to produce who the leaker was or they are all dismissed and none of them would be allowed to use their clerking for the Supreme Court on their resume. It would probably take less than an hour for them to produce the criminal. And make no mistake about it, the leaker committed a criminal act.
There is some more news that broke last night that most people didn’t hear. According to reports, Chief Justice John Roberts sided with liberals on the court. Roberts was apparently trying to barter with the conservative justices in their negotiations. The Chief Justice was reportedly willing to uphold the Mississippi law that would ban abortion at 15 weeks of pregnancy, but he didn’t want to overturn Roe v Wade.
I wish the misinformation news media would stop reporting that “Justice Roberts sided with the liberals on the Court.” He is one of the liberals on the Court.
“It appears that five justices would be voting to overturn Roe. Chief Justice John Roberts did not want to completely overturn Roe v. Wade, meaning he would have dissented from part of Alito’s draft opinion, sources tell CNN, likely with the court’s three liberals.
That would mean that the five conservative justices that would make up the majority overturning Roe are Alito and Justices Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett.
Roberts is willing, however, to uphold the Mississippi law that would ban abortion at 15 weeks of pregnancy, CNN has learned. Under current law, government cannot interfere with a women’s choice to terminate a pregnancy before about 23 weeks, when a fetus could live outside the womb.”
Now the Democrats know exactly who to target with their threats, intimidation, and harassment. Does this mean that the Democrats are now going to be involved in an insurrection against the US Supreme Court?
At least in this, the country will go back to the intentional system in the manner it was created, where states make the laws when the federal government has no say. Make no mistake about it, the federal government has no say on abortion.
Rich is a conservative, syndicated opinion writer and owner of MAGA-Chat.com. He writes about politics, culture, liberty, and faith.
Fight tech tyranny. Join Rich on MAGA-Chat.com, where free speech is still free. Join the revolution!