I’m not a doctor. I’m not even a lawyer. And I never worked for the FDA. But I can read just fine.
I want to know why no one telling us that the Pfizer vaccine was approved can read properly? If I can find the fact sheet on the FDA’s website for the Pfizer vaccine, how come no one in the mainstream news media can do the same? Aren’t they supposed to investigate claims made by the government?
Why didn’t any of the woke corporate executives who are now mandating their employees get the jab check to see if the FDA is telling the truth? They just listened to the losers and the mainstream media tell you the intentional confusion put out by Jennifer Woodcock of the FDA, and now everyone thinks that the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine was approved. I’m here to tell you that by the FDA’s own data, it was not.
To start off with, you need to know that there is a company called Pfizer. There is a company called BioNTech. And there is an entity called Pfizer-BioNTech. It looks like the FDA either needs to hire better writers for Fact Sheet messaging or they tried to pull a fast one.
On August 23, 2021, the FDA posted the “Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine EUA Fact Sheet for Recipients and Caregivers” on their website. This is the sheet that those who administer the jab will hand out to patients.
In the screenshot below, I highlighted the important parts of the document that can be read in full HERE. As of this writing, the screenshot below is what’s on the FDA website, with a marking “Revised: date of 23 August 2021.”
In the first highlighted section, the document says:
“COMIRNATY (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) is an FDA-approved COVID-19 vaccine made by Pfizer for BioNTech.”
Comirnaty, pronounced koe-mir’-na-tee, was approved for use by the FDA. Comirnaty is a BioNTech product that the FDA says was created by Pfizer for BioNTech. That’s great! But the problem is, BioNTech said that Comirnaty will not be available for use until 2023 or 2024.
Now that makes sense.
If you go back to 2020, when the COVID vaccine creation started, going through that year up to 2024, would make five years. Five years is a normal time to test a vaccine for efficacy and safety. BioNTech does not want to be hit with liabilities if there are problems with the vaccine, so they are going through the motions to do clinical trials and test it.
The next highlighted part of the screenshot says, “The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine has received EUA from FDA…”
The Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine is the one that we all know about, that everyone has been getting. According to the FDA, Pfizer-BioNTech is still under Emergency Use Authorization. So then how come everyone is saying that the Pfizer vaccine has been approved by the FDA? Clearly, according to the FDA’s own document, it was not. Comirnaty was the vaccine that was approved, but it’s not even available for some time.
The term “available” is important. Emergency Use Authorization is granted by the FDA “during public health emergencies to provide access to medical products that may be effective,” as the FDA writes if it assesses that the potential benefits of the vaccine outweighs the “known and potential risks” and if “there is no adequate, approved, and available alternative … to prevent COVID-19.” There’s that word again: available.
The final highlighted section is the footnotes of the document, which are very contradictory:
The licensed vaccine has the same formulation as the EUA-authorized vaccine and the products can be used interchangeably to provide the vaccination series without presenting any safety or effectiveness concerns. The products are legally distinct with certain differences that do not impact safety or effectiveness.
It says the “The licensed vaccine (Comirnaty) has the same formulation as the EUA-authorized vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech) and that the two products can be used interchangeably. It then goes on to say that the two products are “legally distinct” with “certain differences” that don’t impact safety or effectiveness.
So they’re saying that the two vaccines are so much alike they can be used interchangeably, but we have to understand they are two different products with specific differences. They can either be used interchangeably or they are not the same thing.
Folks, that’s gobbledygook talk to protect themselves against liability. I think they did this so that people who now go to get vaccinated will think they are getting an approved vaccine when they are not. We know they are not getting Comirnaty because there are still EUA vaccines and that can only happen by law when there is no approved vaccine available.
Here’s another document by the FDA:
The third bullet point highlighted shows the condition for EUA being granted as “There is no adequate, approved, and available alternative to the emergency use of the Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine to prevent COVID-19.”
Janssen is the name given to Johnson & Johnson’s vaccine.
What this means is once a vaccine for COVID is approved and made available, Emergency Use Authorization must be revoked for all other vaccines. Since Comirnaty was approved by the FDA, that means if it was available, Johnson and Johnson, Moderna, and the Pfizer-Biotech vaccines have to have their EUA revoked.
Since the FDA fact sheet for Pfizer-BioNTech says Comirnaty was approved and that the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine is still under EUA, then the only conclusion we can make is that BioNTech was not lying when they stated Comirnaty would not be available for a few years. This means that the only vaccines available are under Emergency Use Authorization, and according to Title 21, Section 360bbb-3, no employer, including the federal government, can force employees to get vaccinated with experimental medicine.
Here’s what Title 21 says:
Title 21, Section 360bbb-3 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the “FD&C Act”) vests the Secretary of Health and Human Services with the permissive authority to grant Emergency Use Authorizations (“EUAs”) providing that appropriate conditions designed to ensure that individuals to whom the product is administered are informed: [emphasis added]
1. that the Secretary has authorized the emergency use of the product;
2. of the significant known and potential benefits and risks of such use, and of the extent to which such benefits and risks are unknown; and
3. of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the product that are available and of their benefits and risks. [emphasis added]
Folks, the media lied and the Biden administration did nothing to correct them. Corporations are now planning to force their employees to get vaccinated wittingly or not with experimental medicine and it’s illegal.
VIDEO OF THE DAYIdiots Twerk On Ambulance After Shooting In Oakland, CA
If your employer tells you that you need to get vaccinated, print out the document from the link provided above and show them that there is no vaccine that is approved and available, and that the only vaccines that are available are under Emergency Use Authorization.
Rich is a conservative syndicated opinion writer and runs Maga-Chat.com. He writes about politics, culture, liberty, and faith.
Fight tech tyranny. John Rich on MAGA-Chat.com where free speech is still free. JOIN the revolution!