Court Rules Against Democrat State Leaders – Will Allow Inspection of Fulton County, PA Dominion Voting Machines

The Democrats in Pennsylvania have lost another one after a judge ruled that Attorney General Josh Shapiro and Secretary of State Veronica Degraffenreid have no right to tell Fulton County, Pennsylvania that they cannot have the voting machines they paid for tested to see if they are working correctly.

Fulton County will now allow the state Senate to have the machines tested to make sure they are working up to specs.

Don’t you find it curious that at the same time Democrats and their media lapdogs insist that the 2020 election was fair and aboveboard, they fight tooth and nail to prevent any type of examination of the voting?

If it was me and I knew there was no cheating, I would welcome a review that I could use to bludgeon the other party with. What does a cover-up, get you? Suspicious looks and nothing else.

Via The Amistad Project:

Harrisburg, Pennsylvania/December 23, 2021 – The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania has ruled in favor of The Amistad Project and Fulton County, Pennsylvania, allowing the county to send its Dominion voting machines to the State Senate for inspection on January 10.

“The court recognized that it was improper to demand that the county – which owns the machines, and has the responsibility of running the election along with the legislature – can’t determine whether the machines worked properly,” said Phill Kline, director of The Amistad Project. “As the judge noted, there’s no justification for preventing the county from looking at their own machines.”

Pennsylvania’s attorney general and secretary of state had sued to prevent the inspection, which was originally scheduled for December 22, but the judge determined that it must be allowed to proceed, with a short delay to allow experts from both sides to come up with a formal protocol for the inspection.

“Executive branch officials were trying to stop the inspection altogether, but the judge did not grant their emergency motion to stop the inspection,” explained Amistad Project attorney Tom King. “They did not go to court seeking a delay; they sought to stop it, and they lost.”