Dominion Voting Systems Attempt to Prevent An Investigation of Their Voting Machines – This Time in Pennsylvania

Dominion Voting Systems are once more attempting to put an end to the inspection of their machines by a disinterested party. They want the two companies they used in Arizona to do the search.

However, over half of the business, those two companies make every year comes from Dominion and if they reported anything remiss, they would likely lose their business.

In fact, the only time that these two companies have been used as machine inspectors is to rubber-stamp the machines as honest.

According to CBS Pennsylvania:

Dominion Voting Systems has asked a court to restrict any inspection of its voting machines as part of what Republican lawmakers call a “forensic investigation” of Pennsylvania’s 2020 election to a laboratory that has specific credentials.

The Denver-based voting-system manufacturer filed paperwork in court Monday evening as Republican lawmakers move to inspect Dominion’s machines and software in southern Pennsylvania’s sparsely populated Fulton County using an unaccredited contractor that has no election experience.

In its court papers, Dominion requested an order requiring that any inspection be conducted by a federally accredited voting system test lab or a national laboratory used by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency.

The problem for Dominion is that the federally “accredited” voting system test labs were not, federally “accredited” at the time they were used to inspect voting machines. They did not get accredited until after The Gateway Pundit reported that the companies were not accredited at the time they were appointed to inspect the voting machines in Arizona. They applied for accreditation shortly after that, but their livelihood still depended on Dominion, and finding against them would probably put them out of business.

From The Gateway Pundit

The problem for Dominion is that the federally “accredited” voting system test labs for years weren’t accredited when they were used as accredited test labs.  We found this in Arizona this last year.  When we pointed this out, the EAC immediately updated the two labs used in Arizona that day.   These labs self-assess anyways and no one is reviewing these assessments that we can tell.

The other entities that Dominion mentions, “national laboratory used by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency” are also likely limited in nature too.

What it comes down to, is Dominion wants to pick who looks at their voting machines.

As an auditor or investigator, when someone prevents access to data requested, multiple red flags arise.  Many companies have annual code of conduct documents that all employees must sign that state that each and every employee must provide auditors the documents they ask for when they ask for them.  Going against this policy could likely lead to termination.

Steven Ahle