We are beginning to see that the EAC (Election Assistance Commission is remiss in doing its job. They have been certifying Dominion Machines even though they are uncertifiable. The rules say that all machines must have the most up-to-date software and any software that isn’t must be removed. The latest example is in Tennessee. How did they certify these machines? Was it a mistake or did they do so on purpose? After all, they are part of the Biden administration.
In Pennsylvania, the machines were not properly hardened and should never have been certified.
Dominion claims that the investigators looking into their voting machines for Fulton County will damage or destroy their machines when they make forensic copies of their computers. This is simply not true. But it is true that it is harmful to your case to lie to a judge.
Dominion’s remedy for their complaint is to suggest that the only companies to investigate their machines should be related to EAC-approved or cyber-approved companies as listed in their complaint.
The problem that Dominion has is not that their machines will be mishandled or damaged as a result of thorough inspections by independent professionals. Rather. Dominion must be concerned that the court and the County will find out that their machines should not have been certified for use.
System hardening is the process that secures computing systems by reducing the attack surface to make them hack-proof. It consists of a set of tools and methodologies that removes the non-essential services, thus minimizing the security risks to your system as much as possible.
If the machines are hackable, that is a very bad thing for an honest election, which I don’t believe Pennsylvania had. What is the EAC doing? It’s hard to believe they made as many mistakes as they have. Is something else in play. Are they intentionally letting these machines be used even though they do not follow the law?
The machine audit firms are paid by Dominion. What could possibly go wrong?
