Jean Camp a professor who works for the University of Indiana could become part of the Durham probe as he has shown as John Durham has already indicted Michael Sussmann of Hillary’s law firm Perkins Coie for lying to the FBI about such a connection. Camp was a robust Hillary supporter and it was she who allegedly made the connection between Trump and Alpha.
Camp is also one of the techies who called for resistance to Trump. It is alleged that she led a group of computer scientists who uncovered the said connection. But, is the truth that they actually manufactured it? Somehow the results of this study made it into the Hillary financed Steele Dosier. That dossier was then shared by Steele to the FBI and to the news media.
The connection noted that there were a lot of pings between Alpha Bank and Trump Tower. But, that can occur when a lot of people searched alpha and Trump, which they did after the hoax appeared in the media. “Both the FBI and the Mueller gang found there was no connection between the two. Another interesting fact is that Camp had received a $2.2 million dollar grant from the Obama administration in 2012.
Kimberly Strassel at the Wall Street Journal reported:
The Alfa story came to life in October 2016, when Franklin Foer of Slate was gulled into writing that a largely anonymous “benevolent posse” of “computer scientists,” “spurred by a sense of shared idealism,” had discovered data showing secret communications between the Trump Organization and Russia-based Alfa Bank. Cybersecurity professionals instantly ridiculed the data as nonsense, and the FBI dismissed it, but the liberal media kept it alive. In October 2018, the New Yorker’s Dexter Filkins devoted a 7,600-word panegyric to the “self-appointed guardians of the Internet” who continued to flog the claims.
In recent court filings, Mr. Durham explains that these tech experts—including Rodney Joffe, formerly of Neustar, Inc.—were in cahoots with the same crew as Mr. Steele, using the same playbook. They worked with Democratic lawyers at Perkins Coie and opposition-research firm Fusion GPS, with the goal of dredging up “derogatory” information on Mr. Trump that would please “VIPs” in the Clinton campaign. The techies did so, the Durham indictment says, in part by mining protected internet data that had been supplied to a government contractor—allowing them to snoop on the White House as well as Trump Tower and Mr. Trump’s Manhattan apartment.
Mr. Joffe’s legal team continues to insist he is “apolitical” and wasn’t aware his lawyer, Michael Sussmann, was billing Team Clinton. (A grand jury impaneled by Mr. Durham indicted Mr. Sussmann in September on a charge of making a false statement to the FBI. Mr. Sussmann pleaded not guilty.) The press initially tried to ignore the story, then resorted to parsing the definition of “spying,” justifying the accused, and trashing Mr. Durham.
The problem for the last-gaspers is that the techies they seek to defend have already put too much on the record that suggests their real concern was a President Trump, not national security. Start with the company that the “apolitical” Mr. Joffe kept. One of his colleagues involved in the project and referenced in the Sussmann indictment is Paul Vixie, whose Twitter feed sports a long record of liberal, anti-Trump sentiments. Another member of the circle—who took on the job of publishing the Joffe data—is L. Jean Camp, an Indiana University computer-science professor and Clinton supporter who called on Americans to join the “resistance” against Mr. Trump. So much for the media’s description of a gang of politically innocent nerds.