During the 2020 election, a curious thing happened in almost all of the swing states that are theoretically impossible. Huge drops of votes, almost exclusively for Biden were dumped in the early morning hours of November 4th.
In Milwaukee, 143,379 votes were dropped in one shot, all for Joe Biden. This reeks of a possible coordinated effort to make sure Biden won the election. The odds of such a drop in one state are remote bur how about the odds of it occurring in five states?
Now, we are told that election official, Claire Woodall-Vogg, was giving daily information to liberal groups, telling them who was voting early in Milwaukee.
After the counting was declared over for the night, Woodall-Vogg was caught on tape running votes through a tabulator and onto a flash drive, which breaks the chain of custody, making it illegal in Wisconsin.
#ICYMI: Top Election Chief of #Milwaukee, #Wisconsin CAUGHT on camera illegally tabulating 169,000 mail-in ballots; without observers, breaking the Legal Chain of Custody:#Elections2020 #Election2020 #ElectionResults2020 #Elections #Trump #MAGA @TeamTrump @GOP @realDonaldTrump pic.twitter.com/Hv9P2Y1UVF
— Michael Johns (@Michael03272961) November 10, 2020
Via Wisconsin Right Now:
A flash drive that contained crucial absentee voter information in the 2020 presidential election was briefly lost during the early morning hours of Wednesday Nov. 4 as the world waited for Milwaukee to reveal its ballot counts.
Sources within Milwaukee County law enforcement told Wisconsin Right Now exclusively that the executive director of the Milwaukee Election Commission, Claire Woodall-Vogg, realized she had lost the flash drive when she left, with police escort, the Central Count building where ballots were tallied. She was en route to the county courthouse to report “the results of more than 169,000 absentee ballots collected in the City of Milwaukee,” the Hill previously reported.
The Gateway Pundit discovered an email sent from Ryan Chew, from the Election Group to Woodall-Vogg:
“Damn, Claire, you have a flair for drama, delivering just the margin needed at 3:00 am. I bet you had those votes counted at midnight, and just wanted to keep the world waiting.”
And now there’s more…
Milwaukee Election Director Claire Woodall-Vogg was also giving daily reports on voting data to Democrat operative Michael Spitzer-Rubenstein and private liberal organizations before the election on exactly who was voting.
VIDEO OF THE DAYIdiots Twerk On Ambulance After Shooting In Oakland, CA
The MacIver Institute in Wisconsin gained access to the emails from Spitzer-Rubenstein and Woodall-Vogg.
Woodall-Vogg admits to handing over the daily reports to the liberal groups.
Once early voting started, she was providing him with a daily update on the numbers of absentee ballots returned and still outstanding in each ward.
“Here’s what I’ll need,” Spitzer-Rubenstein wrote to her in late October, “1) Number of ballot preparation teams, 2) Number of returned ballots per ward, 3) Number of outstanding ballots per ward.”
Even with this private data sharing that no other organization received (or should have received), Spitzer-Rubenstein still wanted more. He wanted access to the Milwaukee Election Commission’s voter database.
“We’re hoping there’s an easier way to get the data out of WisVote than you having to manually export it every day or week,” he wrote. “To that end, we have two questions: 1. Would you or someone else on your team be able to do a screen-share so we can see the process for an export? 2. Do you know if WisVote has an API [application programming interface] or anything similar so that it can connect with other software apps? That would be the holy grail (but I’m not expecting it to be that easy).”
That may have been a bridge too far, but Woodall-Vogg still gave Spitzer-Rubenstein exclusive access to the database in the form of daily reports. Why? What exactly was the National Vote at Home Institute doing with its daily reports? Was it making sure that people were actually voting from home by going door-to-door to collect ballots from voters who had not yet turned theirs in?
Was this criminal behavior? I have no idea as I am not a lawyer or familiar with Wisconsin election law. But people who do have that knowledge should look into this just in case.